| The Internet is not a silver bullet for
reaching young voters. Used properly, it can be an inexpensive way
to communicate with and mobilize select groups of young people. Used
the wrong way, it can turn many young people off.
Meanwhile, don't forget that (just like older
voters) a majority of young adults
rely much more on television news, as well as newspapers and magazines,
when making voting decisions, than on the Internet.
And a majority of young adults-just like older voters-say they
mainly rely on newspapers and magazines, along with television news,
to gather information in making voting decisions, with the Internet
lagging far behind.
Internet Campaigning
No silver bullet: Because younger
voters spend more time online than older voters, conventional wisdom
says that the Internet is the best way to reach them. Actually,
it is merely one good way to reach some selected young adults, and
potentially a poor way to contact most of them. A critical
factor is knowing which ones you are trying to reach.
A November 2003 survey by Lake Snell Perry & Associates and
the Tarrance Group found: among the most receptive groups will likely
be young people least engaged in the community or political process
-- those not registered to vote; Independents; political moderates;
infrequent church goers/nonreligious and non-college youth.
Liberal Democrats and conservative Republicans are particularly
responsive to online chat rooms, issue-oriented campaign email,
and Meetup.org events -- suggesting that ideological
partisans use these sources to find likeminded youth.
Internet communications techniques are likely to work well during
the primary season since partisans and ideologues are generally
more engaged in the political process at that time than are Independents
or moderates.
Not surprisingly, among the least receptive
groups to contact via the Internet will likely be the young people
least engaged in the community or political process -- those
not registered to vote; Independents; political moderates; infrequent
church goers/nonreligious and non-college youth.
What Works and What Doesn't: Some
Internet-based campaign methods are likely more effective than others,
and some will actually turn many young people off. The dividing
line: methods that invite young people to interact with others versus
those that are unsolicited.
When asked to rate eight techniques to which they would be most
likely to pay attention, three of the four methods young people
mentioned most were interactive - online chat rooms, campaign weblogs,
and campaign sponsored events organized by Meetup.org.

Likewise, all four of the least popular methods involved unsolicited
contact: emails with campaign updates, emails urging voter turnout,
banner ads, and text messaging to handheld devices. Text messaging
proved particularly unpopular, perhaps because many wireless services
charge users for each message they receive.
Voting Decisions
Just because the Internet is an inexpensive way to contact voters,
doesn't mean it's an effective method of influencing their voting
decisions. As it turns out, young people are
much more likely to rely on a range of information sources before
they use information from the Internet.
Like older voters, traditional media channels like newspapers/magazines
and TV news are still the most important influence on young people's
voting decisions. Close behind are friends and family members and
candidate debates. Only after these four do young people say they
will rely on information from the Internet in deciding their vote.
Most importantly, no demographic group cites
the Internet as more important than traditional news sources such
as newspapers/magazines and television programs.

Trust and Accuracy
Interestingly, young people do trust the information they get from
the Internet. They say that they are equally trusting of the Internet
and newspapers/television - and believe these sources are equally
accurate. A specific kind of source they trust are the online candidate
profiles produced by nonpartisan civic organizations such as Project
Vote Smart or the League of Women Voters' DemocracyNet
(DNet). Young adults say they know and trust them to deliver objective
information about candidates and their positions.
For more information, see CYV's survey website at .

|